|
|
Place your cursor over
the Member Ad you are interested in and click on it: you will be taken to
their website for more information.
|

Items of Interest
& Other Articles

Current newsletter

Application

Advertising rates.


for all PDF files
Attend ASA CALIFORNIA MEETINGS
-They are open to members:
SAVE THE DATE: ASA
BUSINESS FORUM AND CONVENTION 2012 SET FOR MARCH 1-3 IN
SAN ANTONIO, CA.
For meetings in your area contact your local chapter.
Click here for Chapter
location and Information.
_________________________
ASAC Health Plans Pay ASAC and
Your Local Chapter!
Act now and Hodges Insurance will provide all your adds
and terms and cobra administration for free. Contact
Dave Hodges for details.

Call today! 1-800-743-6975
_________________________

Previous Articles
Click to read the article:
Description of CSLB License
Classifications

Senate Bill 189 Becomes Law:
Resulting In Significant Changes To California's Lien
Laws After July 1, 2012
By William C. Last, Jr., Esq. LAST & FAORO

Appellate Court Affirms that Oral
Agreement for Home Improvement Project May Be Enforced
Against Sophisticated Homeowner Notwithstanding Business
& Professions Code Requirement that All Home Improvement
Contracts Be in Writing
By Jonathan M. Bowne, Esq., LAST & FAORO

**Two Important Changes to
Mechanics Liens Kick In January 2011**
By Jonathan
M. Bowne, Esq., LAST & FAORO

Public Entities Must Tell Even if the Contractor Doesn‘t
Ask!
By Theresa Crawford Tate, CRAWFORD &
BANGS, LLP

Convert your STATE
FUND Workers Compensation plan from an individual
policy to the ASAC group program and
save 6% Call 888-310-2722 for details. Ask for group #12
ASAC / PDCC Rated “A”
RETIREMENT PLAN:
ASAC has established a retirement plan in which you as
a member can participate.
The retirement plan is custom designed to meet your
needs. 401K, Pension, SEP and Defined Benefit Plans are
all available.
We offer most major no load funds in our pension and
401k plans. Whether you have an existing retirement plan
or are considering establishing a plan, ASAC can help.
Please contact our Benefits Administrator David Hodges.
1-800/743-6975 |
|
NEW!!
SB 293 & SB 474 -
Signed by Governor TWO Victories for the Construction
Industry!
October 11, 2011 American Subcontractors
Association of California Supported!
SB 293 - RETENTION affects retention in public works
projects
SB 474 - INDEMNIFICATION affects commercial construction
See Below for What these 2 Bills Governor Brown Signed
mean to YOU and YOUR Company! These two new laws
are MAJOR improvements for the construction industry! THANKS TO ALL OF YOU WHO HELPED BY WRITING
LETTERS!
SB 293 (Padilla)
(SCROLL DOWN FOR SB 474)
Introduced in behalf of the California State Council of
Laborers, and as subsequently amended to cap retentions
in public projects, it was supported by numerous groups.
ASAC always supported the 5% retention cap and shorter
pay period but was in full support of SB 474 when it was
also amended to preserve subcontractors' late bond claim
rights. In support as of the final senate staff analysis
were:
Air-conditioning & Refrigeration Contractors Association
Associated General Contractors of California
Building Industry Credit Association
California Chapters of the National Electrical
Contractors Association
California Landscape & Irrigation Council
California Legislative Conference of Plumbing, Heating,
and Piping Industry
Concrete Contractors Association, Inc.
Engineering & Utility Contractors Association
Golden State Building Exchange
Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
State Building and Construction Trades Council
(per staff report)
In opposition were hundreds of public entities.
SB 293 takes effect
January 1, 2012. It:
1.Decreases,
from 10 to 7, the number of days by which a prime
contractor or subcontractor must pay a subcontractor
after receiving a progress payment, unless otherwise
agreed to in writing.
2.Requires a subcontractor to give written notice to the
surety and bond principal that he or she is enforcing a
claim prior to completion or recordation of the Notice
of Completion of a project, except as specified, if the
20-day public works preliminary notice was required by
any person that has no direct contractual relationship
with the contractor and who has not given notice as
provided in Civil Code Section 3098, that person may
enforce a claim by giving written notice to the surety
and bond principal within 15 days after recordation of a
notice of completion. If no notice of completion has
been recorded, the time for giving written notice to the
surety and the bond principal is extended to 75 days
after completion of the work of improvement. This
provision would not apply in the event that all progress
payments, other than those disputed in good faith, have
been made to a subcontractor who has a direct
contractual relationship with the general contractor to
whom the claimant has provided materials or services, or
in the case of a subcontractor who has been terminated
from the project pursuant to the contract, all such
progress payments have been made as of the termination
date, except those disputed in good faith.
3.Exempts a laborer from preliminary notice requirements
to a surety and bond principal and any deadline to
enforce a claim after the completion of a project for
private works of improvement.
4.Prohibits a public entity from retaining more than
five percent of a contract price until final completion
and acceptance of a project.
5.Requires that retention proceeds between an original
contractor and a subcontractor, or between two
subcontractors, not exceed five percent of payment or
contract price. Does not apply if the contractor
provides written notice to the subcontractor, prior to
or at the time that the bid is requested, that a bond
may be required and the subcontractor subsequently is
unable or refuses to furnish to the contractor a
performance or payment bond issued by an admitted surety
insurer.
6. Prohibits progress payments on public works contracts
from being made in excess of 100 percent of the
percentage of actual work completed.
7.Authorizes a public entity to retain more than five
percent of the contract price in public works projects
under the following conditions:
A. For certain projects awarded by state departments,
the project is substantially complex and the department
includes this finding and the actual retention amount in
the bid documents;
B. For projects awarded by local entities, the governing
body of the local public entity, or its designee, has
approved or ratified by a majority vote during a
properly noticed and normally scheduled public hearing
prior to bid that the project is substantially complex,
and includes this finding and the actual retention
amount in the bid documents;
and,
C. Retention proceeds between an original contractor and
a subcontractor, or between two subcontractors, shall
not exceed the specified retention percentage in the
contract between the public entity and the original
contractor.
1.Sunsets these retention provisions on January 1, 2016.
2.Defines "public entity" to mean the state, including
every state agency, office, department, division,
bureau, board, or commission, the California State
University, the University of California, a city,
county, city and county, including chartered cities and
chartered counties, district, special district, public
authority, political subdivision, public corporation, or
nonprofit transit corporation wholly owned by a public
agency and formed to carry out the purposes of the
public agency.
SB 474 (Evans)...Indemnity
Reform
Cosponsored by :
California Association of Sheet Metal and Air
Conditioning, Contractors' National Association,
California Legislative Conference of the Plumbing,
Heating and Piping Industry,
Concrete Contractors Association,
Crane Owners Association,
California Chapters of the National Electrical
Contractors Association.
In opposition, among others, were:
Associated General Contractors
California Conference of Carpenters
Construction Employers Association
SB 474 takes effect on
January 1, 2013
SB 474's staff synopsis as enrolled and sent to the
Governor:
1. Prohibits
construction contracts requiring indemnity, insurance,
or defense obligations by a subcontractor for the active
negligence or willful misconduct of a general
contractor, his/her agents, or certain other
subcontractors.
2. Provides that, unless otherwise prohibited under this
bill, the parties to a construction contract can freely
contract for other protections and obligations of each
party, but allows numerous exemptions, including
residential construction contracts, direct contracts
with a public agency or owner, and insurance contracts
for project wrap up and workers' compensation.
3. Requires an insurer to uphold their contractual
obligations to additional insureds pursuant to Presley
Homes, Inc. v. American State Insurance Company (2001)
90 Cal.App.4th 571.
4. Provides that an insurer maintains reimbursement
rights from a general contractor or other subcontractor
pursuant to the holding in Buss v. Superior Court (1997)
16 Cal.4th 35.
5. Provides a defense or settlement option for
commercial construction contracts similar to existing
law regarding residential construction contracts under
which a subcontractor, after receiving claim information
from the general contractor, has the option to defend
the claim or pay its portion of the claim.
6. Provides that in the event a contractor fails to
maintain its obligations to defend or pay its portion of
the claim, the general contractor may make a claim for
compensatory and consequential damages and reasonable
attorney's fees.
7. Clarifies that a public agency is prohibited from
shifting its liability for its active negligence to a
contractor, subcontractor, or materials supplier.
8. Establishes that a project owner, not acting as a
project manager, general contractor, or materials
supplier, is prohibited from shifting liability for its
active negligence to a contractor, subcontractor, or
materials supplier.
9. Provides that these new rights and obligations shall
be construed to affect the obligation, if any, of either
a contractor or construction manager to indemnify,
including defending or paying the costs to defend, a
public agency against any claim arising from the alleged
active negligence of the public agency under Civil Code
Section 2782(b) or to indemnify, including defending or
paying the costs to defend, an owner of privately owned
real property to be improved against any claim arising
from the alleged active negligence of the owner under
Civil Code Section 2782(c).
10.Provides that the foregoing changes shall not be
construed to affect the obligation, if any, of either a
contractor or construction manager to provide or
maintain insurance covering the acts or omissions of the
promisor, including additional insurance endorsements
covering the acts or omissions of the promisor during
ongoing and completed operations pursuant to a
construction contract with a public agency under Civil
Code Section 2782(b) or an owner of privately owned real
property to be improved under Civil Code Section
2782(c).
ASA California
will continue to educate its members and supporters -
watch your e-mail for more information on how these two
bills will help YOU!
Non-Members: Please e-mail us at asac@asacalif.com to
find out how you can join the association that is
LEADING SUBCONTRACTORS AND SUPPLIERS TO EQUITABLE
LEGISLATION IN CALIFORNIA! Visit ASA California on
the Web!
www.ASACalif.com Soon to include a list of
ASAC members and Government Relations Donors. Add
it to your favorites and visit often!
ASAC Appreciates YOUR Help!
ASAC leaders asked you to do your part, helping our
Subcontractor community with your letters and phone
calls.
Many of you came through, and can take pride in helping
get these two bills through the Legislature.
Remember -- We only ask when we truly believe your
efforts will be influential in determining the direction
a bill or movement heads.
Those efforts do make a difference! There's strength in
numbers!!!!!
Santo Pernicano
Daniel McLennon, Esq.
ASAC President
ASAC Government Relations Chair
AREA-WEST FENCE CO.
McLENNON LAW CORPORATION
619-561-4900
415-394-6688
santo@areawestfence.com
dmclennon@mclennonlaw.com
A
PRELIMINARY PRIMER By Theresa Crawford
Tate, Crawford & Bangs September 2011
It’s not until a project falls apart and payments stop
that most contractors start to wonder if all the
preliminary steps at the start of the job were done
correctly. Prior to that, everything was looking rosy
and no one usually contemplates a worst-case scenario
(except the attorneys). Did you get a signed contract
back
from the owner or general contractor? Did you correctly
serve your 20-day Preliminary Lien Notice? Is there
still time to serve a Stop Notice or record a Mechanic’s
Lien? In the financial mess that has ruled the
construction industry for the last several years, these
preliminary steps have been critical in deciding who
gets paid and who doesn’t. The construction industry
standard for service of the 20-day Preliminary Lien
Notice (“Preliminary Notice”) was critiqued by the
California Appellate Court in the case of Force Framing
v. Chinatrust Bank (114 Cal. Rptr.3d 855). Thankfully,
the California Appellate Court recognized that
reasonable due diligence on the part of a contractor in
serving its Preliminary Notice did not include
performing a full title search.
Read the whole article in the Newsletter by clicking
here:
Newsletter
ASAC
MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY GOES ON-LINE
IN KEEPING WITH OUR PROMISE TO HELP YOU MARKET YOUR
COMPANY, ASAC IS POSTING MEMBERSHIP CONTACT INFORMATION
ON THE CHAPTER WEBSITE. THE LIST WILL BE OPEN TO THE
GENERAL CONTRACTORS AND OTHER SUBCONTRACTORS WHO MIGHT
USE YOUR COMPANY ON A PROJECT.
To see Directory Click on MEMBER
DIRECTORY at top of page.
** If you want your e-address on the
site, you will need to OPT
IN by contacting the webmaster at
memlist@asacalif.com. Please send any address changes or
corrections to this same place. **
Logos next to the names are available for a one time
set-up fee of $40.00. Contact us at
memlist@asacalif.com
to arrange this option.
FAIRNESS TO SUBCONTRACTORS CONTRIBUTORS:
These
companies came through already in 2011 for ASAC!
Thank you to:
|
GOLD =$1000.00 |
SILVER =$750.00 |
|
Area West Fence Co. |
Hakanson Construction Inc. |
|
Associated Tile Contractors of Northern CA |
|
|
Lescure Company Inc. |
& |
|
McLennon Law Corp. |
|
|
Union Roofing Contractors Association/td>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER |
|
BRONZE =$500.00 |
Western Fire Protection Inc. |
|
California Sheet
Metal Works Inc. |
|
|
Frank M. Booth Design Build Co. |
|
|
Nor CA Glass Management Association |
|
|
Nor CA Painting & Finishing Contractors Inc. |
|
|
RPW/United Agencies |
|
As you can
imagine, running bills in the California Legislature and
defending your subcontractor rights is a costly
undertaking. ASAC asks that you contribute what you are
able to this effort. Please write your check today. For
more information and a
CONTRIBUTION FORM
Please Click on the link.
Public/Private Partnerships -- A NEW CONCERN FOR
2011-2012
-3Ps, Public/Private Partnerships is an emerging trend
whereby the public provides lands that are being
developed by private companies that have no legal
obligation to pay contractors. The contractors have no
lien rights because the land is publically owned, there
is no public money to go after with a Stop Notice, and
payment and performance bonds are not required to be in
place.
Much of the money is coming from out of the United
States. The developers are forming LLCs and other
protected entities. If the project goes bad or
gets canceled, the developer can bankrupt the LLC and
move on without paying anybody -- there is no recourse
for the contractors.
The ugly problem is already with us: a toll road was
built in the San Diego area. The developer went
bankrupt, banks were first in line to scoop up any
monies that existed, and contractors had no lien rights
and are not being paid.
ASAC proposes requiring the developer to provide payment
and performance bonds, in a manner similar to the Little
Miller Act.
Opposition would be the foreign investors. Support would
come from Surety / Bonding companies, General
Contractors, Bankers, and Subcontractors.
Please help us gather information on this issue.
Send an e-mail to asac@asacalif.com with information on
any Public-Private Partnership Projects (4-Ps !!)
you know about. So far we are aware of these
three, but what about in your locality?
1. San Francisco has the $1 billion, Presidio project.
2. San Diego there was that toll road ...
3. The new HUGE Solar Power plant in the desert.
SAVE THE DATE: ASA
BUSINESS FORUM AND CONVENTION 2012 SET FOR MARCH 1-3 IN
SAN ANTONIO
ASA’s flagship education and networking event for
subcontractors, the ASA Business Forum and Convention,
will take place March 1-3, 2012, at the Hyatt Regency
San Antonio. In addition to dozens of educational
sessions designed to help construction subcontractors
improve their businesses, the convention will include
special events and networking opportunities. The Hyatt
Regency San Antonio is located near the Alamo in the
heart of San Antonio’s famed River Walk, providing
immediate access to lush River Walk area restaurants and
boutiques. Mark your calendar now for this once-a-year
event! Throughout the year, visit
www.asaonline.com
for updates on convention programming and special
events. Call (888) 421-1442 to make your hotel room
reservation. The cutoff for the ASA special room rate of
$189 (single/double) is Jan. 28, 2012.
A CHANCE TO HELP A FELLOW
CONSTRUCTION ORGANIZATION RE: TIE-OFF REQUIREMENTS
DURING THE ERECTION AND DISMANTLING OF SCAFFOLDING
I am reaching out to construction industry colleagues to
obtain an informal poll about experiences and challenges
others in the subcontracting trades might be having
regarding tie-off requirements during the erection and
dismantling of scaffolding.
I am hearing more and more reports from the field of
GC’s and OCIP safety inspectors demanding tie-off during
scaffold erection and dismantling. Given that masonry is
a heavy trade utilizing tubular heavy gauge scaffold, I
don’t know if this challenge is limited to our trade or
whether others might also be encountering the same
problem.
Federal and Cal/OSHA language on the subject is vague at
best, and the issue has become a pressing problem for
our contractors that contend to these inspectors time
and again that such tie-off is not a viable option nor
is it a safe one.
II would appreciate your input as to what you are hearing
on this issue and what, if any, measures have been taken
in defense of these tie-off requirements. Please reply
julie@ccmca.org with any information you might have.
Julie Trost
Executive Directorbr>
7844 Madison Avenue, Suite 140
Fair Oaks, CA 95628
p. 916.966.7666 f. 916.966.1411
www.ccmca.org
ASAC Quarterly
Meetings October 28, 2011 California State
Capitol, Sacramento CA
FOR ASA California MEMBERS NOW IS THE TIME TO
REVIEW YOUR INSURANCE
For most contractors there has
been little urgency to review their Liability insurance
over the past few years.
Payrolls and sales have been down, and so have premiums.
Insurance has not been a major expense factor. There are
two major reasons why that situation might be changing,
and why you should start giving some serious thought to
your insurance program.
The first is the economy itself. There are signs that
indicate that the decline in construction over the past
few years has now slowed, or hopefully stopped, and work
is beginning to come back. It will be many years before
we return to where we were, but we are hearing that many
contractors are having to hire back a few employees as
business starts to pick up. This will definitely impact
your insurance costs.
TThe second reason is the insurance marketplace itself.
Workers Comp rates are already beginning to rise.
General Liability rates often follow. Property insurance
rates are likely to increase as a result of all
the natural disasters both in the US and around the
world. You need to be prepared to bid new jobs
accurately by knowing what your insurance costs are
likely to be in the future, not what they are now.
Your association has been planning ahead for when this
turn-around would take place. We have been working to
put together a Liability/Package program tailored
specifically for our members. It has very attractive
cash flow advantages that any contractor would
appreciate. These include monthly payroll
reporting, rolling the deposit at renewal, no minimum
premium, audits both up and down, competitive rates, and
broad coverages.
To learn more, please call one of these ASAC members who
send part of their commission to the association.
CALL NOW AND START SAVING
IOA Insurance Services
Sacramento CA
Ken Wagner 916-692-7007
ken.wagner@ioausa.com
Lic# 0E67768
Rancho Mesa Insurance Services
San Diego CA
Sam Clayton 619-937-0167
sclayton@ranchomesa.com
Lic# OC32169
RPW / United Agencies
Downey CA
Gregg Wright 562-373-9351
gwright@unitedagencies.com
Lic#
Notes on the ASAC Website Layout:
The American Subcontractors Association of California
(ASAC) website is divided into the sections covering
ASAC's strengths as an association. We have our
Legislative Advocacy
program tracking and developing the new construction
laws in Sacramento. The ASAC, also, is very fortunate to
have a Judicial Advocacy
program run by the finest construction attorneys up and
down California to follow and try the latest
construction cases in California's courts. And, lastly,
ASAC has an expanding Member
Benefits program from insurance offerings, to the
website which has been developed to help keep
subcontractors and suppliers informed of the latest
construction issues affecting their daily business. |

American Subcontractors Association California Inc.
P.O. Box 292867, Sacramento, CA. 95829-2867
Phone: 888-310-2722 Fax: 530-662-2865 Email
 |
|